Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscribe
Total
257 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-3505 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS packets that trigger an error condition. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2181 | 2 Openssl, Oracle | 2 Openssl, Linux | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2182 | 3 Hp, Openssl, Oracle | 6 Icewall Federation Agent, Icewall Mcrp, Icewall Sso and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The BN_bn2dec function in crypto/bn/bn_print.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly validate division results, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6304 | 3 Nodejs, Novell, Openssl | 3 Node.js, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Web Scripting, Openssl | 2025-04-12 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3195 | 9 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 25 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 22 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0207 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The dtls1_listen function in d1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly isolate the state information of independent data streams, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS traffic, as demonstrated by DTLS 1.0 traffic to a DTLS 1.2 server. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2109 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 8 Openssl, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in the ASN.1 BIO implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a short invalid encoding. | |||||
| CVE-2010-1633 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| RSA verification recovery in the EVP_PKEY_verify_recover function in OpenSSL 1.x before 1.0.0a, as used by pkeyutl and possibly other applications, returns uninitialized memory upon failure, which might allow context-dependent attackers to bypass intended key requirements or obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4252 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 1.0.0c, when J-PAKE is enabled, does not properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol, which allows remote attackers to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret, and successfully authenticate, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3864 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 7.6 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple race conditions in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8f through 0.9.8o, 1.0.0, and 1.0.0a, when multi-threading and internal caching are enabled on a TLS server, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via client data that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, related to (1) the TLS server name extension and (2) elliptic curve cryptography. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4577 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with (1) IP address blocks or (2) Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4619 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Server Gated Cryptography (SGC) implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f does not properly handle handshake restarts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-0884 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The implementation of Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and PKCS #7 in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h does not properly restrict certain oracle behavior, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to decrypt data via a Million Message Attack (MMA) adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. | |||||
| CVE-2006-7250 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The mime_hdr_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8t and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4353 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ssl3_take_mac function in ssl/s3_both.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1f allows remote TLS servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted Next Protocol Negotiation record in a TLS handshake. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3210 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ephemeral ECDH ciphersuite functionality in OpenSSL 0.9.8 through 0.9.8r and 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not ensure thread safety during processing of handshake messages from clients, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2008-7270 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0742 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) implementation in crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8o and 1.x before 1.0.0a does not properly handle structures that contain OriginatorInfo, which allows context-dependent attackers to modify invalid memory locations or conduct double-free attacks, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2686 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| crypto/evp/e_aes_cbc_hmac_sha1.c in the AES-NI functionality in the TLS 1.1 and 1.2 implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted CBC data. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0169 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Polarssl | 3 Openssl, Openjdk, Polarssl | 2025-04-11 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
| The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue. | |||||