Total
236 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-2902 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to delete work-directory files via directory traversal sequences in a WAR filename, as demonstrated by the ...war filename. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1183 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.11, when web.xml has no login configuration, does not follow security constraints, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a meta-data complete web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-1088 and CVE-2011-1419. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6357 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate application deployment via the POST method, as demonstrated by a /manager/html/undeploy?path= URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report, stating that "the Apache Tomcat Security team has not accepted any reports of CSRF attacks against the Manager application ... as they require a reckless system administrator. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0013 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the HTML Manager Interface in Apache Tomcat 5.5 before 5.5.32, 6.0 before 6.0.30, and 7.0 before 7.0.6 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML, as demonstrated via the display-name tag. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0534 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.30 does not enforce the maxHttpHeaderSize limit for requests involving the NIO HTTP connector, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (OutOfMemoryError) via a crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2696 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Tomcat, Desktop Workstation, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsp/cal/cal2.jsp in the calendar application in the examples web application in Apache Tomcat on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Desktop Workstation 5, and Linux Desktop 5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the time parameter, related to "invalid HTML." NOTE: this is due to a missing fix for CVE-2009-0781. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2227 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29, 6.0.0 through 6.0.27, and 7.0.0 beta does not properly handle an invalid Transfer-Encoding header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) or obtain sensitive information via a crafted header that interferes with "recycling of a buffer." | |||||
| CVE-2011-3375 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 6.0.30 through 6.0.33 and 7.x before 7.0.22 does not properly perform certain caching and recycling operations involving request objects, which allows remote attackers to obtain unintended read access to IP address and HTTP header information in opportunistic circumstances by reading TCP data. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1582 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.12 and 7.0.13 processes the first request to a servlet without following security constraints that have been configured through annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088, CVE-2011-1183, and CVE-2011-1419. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4858 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.35, and 7.x before 7.0.23 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2526 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.19, when sendfile is enabled for the HTTP APR or HTTP NIO connector, does not validate certain request attributes, which allows local users to bypass intended file access restrictions or cause a denial of service (infinite loop or JVM crash) by leveraging an untrusted web application. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5568 | 2 Apache, Opensuse | 2 Tomcat, Opensuse | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat through 7.0.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via partial HTTP requests, as demonstrated by Slowloris. | |||||
| CVE-2011-5064 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| DigestAuthenticator.java in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 uses Catalina as the hard-coded server secret (aka private key), which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3190 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Certain AJP protocol connector implementations in Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.20, 6.0.0 through 6.0.33, 5.5.0 through 5.5.33, and possibly other versions allow remote attackers to spoof AJP requests, bypass authentication, and obtain sensitive information by causing the connector to interpret a request body as a new request. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2071 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
| java/org/apache/catalina/core/AsyncContextImpl.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.40 does not properly handle the throwing of a RuntimeException in an AsyncListener in an application, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive request information intended for other applications in opportunistic circumstances via an application that records the requests that it processes. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1475 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP BIO connector in Apache Tomcat 7.0.x before 7.0.12 does not properly handle HTTP pipelining, which allows remote attackers to read responses intended for other clients in opportunistic circumstances by examining the application data in HTTP packets, related to "a mix-up of responses for requests from different users." | |||||
| CVE-2011-1419 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.11, when web.xml has no security constraints, does not follow ServletSecurity annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2067 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java in the form authentication feature in Apache Tomcat 6.0.21 through 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.33 does not properly handle the relationships between authentication requirements and sessions, which allows remote attackers to inject a request into a session by sending this request during completion of the login form, a variant of a session fixation attack. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4312 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of Apache Tomcat 6.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack a session via script access to a cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5885 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The replay-countermeasure functionality in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 tracks cnonce (aka client nonce) values instead of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count) values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||