Total
8380 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-6106 | 1 72crm | 1 Wukong Crm | 2025-10-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in WuKongOpenSource WukongCRM 9.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file AdminRoleController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3561 | 1 Ghostxbh | 1 Uzy-ssm-mall | 2025-10-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in ghostxbh uzy-ssm-mall 1.0.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2863 | 1 Arteche | 2 Satech Bcu, Satech Bcu Firmware | 2025-10-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web application of saTECH BCU firmware version 2.1.3, which could allow an unauthenticated local attacker to exploit active administrator sessions and perform malicious actions. The malicious actions that can be executed by the attacker depend on the logged-in user, and may include rebooting the device or modifying roles and permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2025-60956 | 1 Endruntechnologies | 2 Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service, gain escalated privileges, and gain sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-2134 | 1 Bdtask | 1 Hospital Automanager | 2025-10-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask Hospita AutoManager up to 20240223 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /investigation/delete/ of the component Investigation Report Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-255496. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54782 | 1 Nestjs | 1 Devtools-integration | 2025-10-09 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Nest is a framework for building scalable Node.js server-side applications. In versions 0.2.0 and below, a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability was discovered in the @nestjs/devtools-integration package. When enabled, the package exposes a local development HTTP server with an API endpoint that uses an unsafe JavaScript sandbox (safe-eval-like implementation). Due to improper sandboxing and missing cross-origin protections, any malicious website visited by a developer can execute arbitrary code on their local machine. The package adds HTTP endpoints to a locally running NestJS development server. One of these endpoints, /inspector/graph/interact, accepts JSON input containing a code field and executes the provided code in a Node.js vm.runInNewContext sandbox. This is fixed in version 0.2.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-50902 | 1 Old-peanut | 1 Open-shop | 2025-10-09 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in old-peanut Open-Shop (aka old-peanut/wechat_applet__open_source) thru 1.0.0 allows attackers to gain sensitive information via crafted HTTP Post message. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11442 | 1 Jhumanj | 1 Opnform | 2025-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A security flaw has been discovered in JhumanJ OpnForm up to 1.9.3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor has stated that API calls require authentication through Authorization Bearer Tokens, so classic CSRF attacks do not apply here. An attacker would need to possess the JWT through means such as XSS which were mitigated, disabling any form of initial access. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11166 | 2025-10-09 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in all versions up to, and including, 9.0.46. This is due to the plugin exposing state-changing REST actions through an AJAX bridge without proper CSRF token validation, and having destructive logic reachable via GET requests with no permission_callback. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force logged-in administrators to create, update, or delete markers and geometry features via CSRF attacks, and allows anonymous users to trigger mass deletion of markers via unsafe GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3257 | 1 Xujiangfei | 1 Admintwo | 2025-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in xujiangfei admintwo 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /user/updateSet. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-36452 | 1 Webmin | 1 Webmin | 2025-10-08 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ajaxterm module of Webmin versions prior to 2.003. If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended operations may be performed when a user views a malicious page while logged in. As a result, data within a system may be referred, a webpage may be altered, or a server may be permanently halted. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11029 | 1 Vvveb | 1 Vvveb | 2025-10-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A weakness has been identified in givanz Vvveb up to 1.0.7.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. Once again the project maintainer reacted very professional: "I accept the existence of these vulnerabilities. (...) I fixed the code to remove these vulnerabilities and will push the code to github and make a new release." | |||||
| CVE-2025-22963 | 1 Sismics | 1 Teedy | 2025-10-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Teedy through 1.11 allows CSRF for account takeover via POST /api/user/admin. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61604 | 1 Wegia | 1 Wegia | 2025-10-07 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| WeGIA is an open source web manager with a focus on charitable institutions. Versions 3.4.12 and below contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The delete operation for the Almoxarifado entity is exposed via HTTP GET without CSRF protection, allowing a third-party site to trigger the action using the victim’s authenticated session. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4552 | 1 Armandofiore | 1 Fl3r Feelbox | 2025-10-07 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The FL3R FeelBox WordPress plugin through 8.1 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2022-4553 | 1 Armandofiore | 1 Fl3r Feelbox | 2025-10-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The FL3R FeelBox WordPress plugin through 8.1 does not have CSRF check when updating reseting moods which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack and delete the lydl_posts & lydl_poststimestamp DB tables | |||||
| CVE-2014-2369 | 1 Omron | 6 Ns10 Hmi Terminal, Ns12 Hmi Terminal, Ns15 Hmi Terminal and 3 more | 2025-10-06 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web application on Omron NS5, NS8, NS10, NS12, and NS15 HMI terminals 8.1xx through 8.68x allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9889 | 2025-10-06 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The ContentMX Content Publisher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmx_activate_connection function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bind their own ContentMX connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9892 | 2025-10-06 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Restrict User Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9213 | 2025-10-06 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The TextBuilder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 1.0.0 to 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'handleToken' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's authorization token via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Once the token is updated, an attacker can update the user's password and email address. | |||||