Total
554 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-2021 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2025-11-04 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled and the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is disabled (unchecked), improper verification of signatures in PAN-OS SAML authentication enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker to access protected resources. The attacker must have network access to the vulnerable server to exploit this vulnerability. This issue affects PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.3; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.9; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.15, and all versions of PAN-OS 8.0 (EOL). This issue does not affect PAN-OS 7.1. This issue cannot be exploited if SAML is not used for authentication. This issue cannot be exploited if the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is enabled (checked) in the SAML Identity Provider Server Profile. Resources that can be protected by SAML-based single sign-on (SSO) authentication are: GlobalProtect Gateway, GlobalProtect Portal, GlobalProtect Clientless VPN, Authentication and Captive Portal, PAN-OS next-generation firewalls (PA-Series, VM-Series) and Panorama web interfaces, Prisma Access In the case of GlobalProtect Gateways, GlobalProtect Portal, Clientless VPN, Captive Portal, and Prisma Access, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected servers can gain access to protected resources if allowed by configured authentication and Security policies. There is no impact on the integrity and availability of the gateway, portal or VPN server. An attacker cannot inspect or tamper with sessions of regular users. In the worst case, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). In the case of PAN-OS and Panorama web interfaces, this issue allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the PAN-OS or Panorama web interfaces to log in as an administrator and perform administrative actions. In the worst-case scenario, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). If the web interfaces are only accessible to a restricted management network, then the issue is lowered to a CVSS Base Score of 9.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious attempts to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43390 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-11-04 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.2. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47943 | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The firmware upgrade function in the admin web interface of the Rittal IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit devices checks if the patch files are signed before executing the containing run.sh script. The signing process is kind of an HMAC with a long string as key which is hard-coded in the firmware and is freely available for download. This allows crafting malicious "signed" .patch files in order to compromise the device and execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42461 | 1 Elliptic Project | 1 Elliptic | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because BER-encoded signatures are allowed. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42459 | 1 Indutny | 1 Elliptic | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11696 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The application failed to account for exceptions thrown by the `loadManifestFromFile` method during add-on signature verification. This flaw, triggered by an invalid or unsupported extension manifest, could have caused runtime errors that disrupted the signature validation process. As a result, the enforcement of signature validation for unrelated add-ons may have been bypassed. Signature validation in this context is used to ensure that third-party applications on the user's computer have not tampered with the user's extensions, limiting the impact of this issue. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 133, Firefox ESR < 128.5, Thunderbird < 133, and Thunderbird < 128.5. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16156 | 2 Fedoraproject, Perl | 2 Fedora, Comprehensive Perl Archive Network | 2025-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| CPAN 2.28 allows Signature Verification Bypass. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43185 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A downgrade issue was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6. An app may be able to access protected user data. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32977 | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) 13.0.x before 13.0.385, 13.1.x before 13.1.81, 13.2.x before 13.2.183, 14.0.x before 14.0.341 (Patch 5), and 14.1.x before 14.1.101 (Patch 4) allows unauthenticated users to upload backup files to the system. While signature validation is implemented, weaknesses in the validation process can be exploited to upload malicious backup content that could compromise system integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2866 | 1 Libreoffice | 1 Libreoffice | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in LibreOffice allows PDF Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation. In the affected versions of LibreOffice a flaw in the verification code for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures could cause invalid signatures to be accepted as valid This issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.8 before < 24.8.6, from 25.2 before < 25.2.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25292 | 3 Netapp, Omniauth, Onelogin | 3 Storagegrid, Omniauth Saml, Ruby-saml | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently, the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 contain a patch for the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25291 | 3 Netapp, Omniauth, Onelogin | 3 Storagegrid, Omniauth Saml, Ruby-saml | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37568 | 1 Authlib | 1 Authlib | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| lepture Authlib before 1.3.1 has algorithm confusion with asymmetric public keys. Unless an algorithm is specified in a jwt.decode call, HMAC verification is allowed with any asymmetric public key. (This is similar to CVE-2022-29217 and CVE-2024-33663.) | |||||
| CVE-2025-12295 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dap-2695, Dap-2695 Firmware | 2025-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| A weakness has been identified in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC13. The affected element is the function sub_40C6B8 of the component Firmware Update Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack can be launched remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54549 | 2025-10-30 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Cryptographic validation of upgrade images could be circumventing by dropping a specifically crafted file into the upgrade ISO | |||||
| CVE-2020-1464 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1709 and 15 more | 2025-10-29 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| A spoofing vulnerability exists when Windows incorrectly validates file signatures. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass security features and load improperly signed files. In an attack scenario, an attacker could bypass security features intended to prevent improperly signed files from being loaded. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows validates file signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34500 | 2025-10-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34503 | 2025-10-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8556 | 2025-10-22 | N/A | 3.7 LOW | ||
| A flaw was found in CIRCL's implementation of the FourQ elliptic curve. This vulnerability allows an attacker to compromise session security via low-order point injection and incorrect point validation during Diffie-Hellman key exchange. | |||||
| CVE-2025-46774 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-10-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability [CWE-347] in FortiClient MacOS installer version 7.4.2 and below, version 7.2.9 and below, 7.0 all versions may allow a local user to escalate their privileges via FortiClient related executables. | |||||