Total
192 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62038 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in Sovlix MeetingHub meetinghub allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects MeetingHub: from n/a through <= 1.23.9. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62026 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in Blockspare Blockspare blockspare allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Blockspare: from n/a through <= 3.2.13.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59579 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Job Board simple-job-board allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Simple Job Board: from n/a through <= 2.13.7. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59578 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in wpdesk ShopMagic shopmagic-for-woocommerce allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects ShopMagic: from n/a through <= 4.5.6. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53232 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in inkthemes WP Gmail SMTP wp-gmail-smtp allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects WP Gmail SMTP: from n/a through <= 1.0.7. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53218 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in Saad Iqbal AppExperts appexperts allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects AppExperts: from n/a through <= 1.4.5. | |||||
| CVE-2025-47444 | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in Liquid Web GiveWP allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects GiveWP: from n/a before 4.6.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-64502 | 2025-11-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. The MongoDB `explain()` method provides detailed information about query execution plans, including index usage, collection scanning behavior, and performance metrics. Prior to version 8.5.0-alpha.5, Parse Server permits any client to execute explain queries without requiring the master key. This exposes database schema structure and field names, index configurations and query optimization details, query execution statistics and performance metrics, and potential attack vectors for database performance exploitation. In version 8.5.0-alpha.5, a new `databaseOptions.allowPublicExplain` configuration option has been introduced that allows to restrict `explain` queries to the master key. The option defaults to `true` for now to avoid a breaking change in production systems that depends on public `explain` availability. In addition, a security warning is logged when the option is not explicitly set, or set to `true`. In a future major release of Parse Server, the default will change to `false`. As a workaround, implement middleware to block explain queries from non-master-key requests, or monitor and alert on explain query usage in production environments. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55155 | 1 Mantisbt | 1 Mantisbt | 2025-11-10 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT) is an open source issue tracker. In versions 2.27.1 and below, when a user edits their profile to change their e-mail address, the system saves it without validating that it actually belongs to the user. This could result in storing an invalid email address, preventing the user from receiving system notifications. Notifications sent to another person's email address could lead to information disclosure. This issue is fixed in version 2.27.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9958 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-11-06 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 14.10 before 18.2.7, 18.3 before 18.3.3, and 18.4 before 18.4.1, that could have allowed Guest users to access sensitive information stored in virtual registry configurations. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32275 | 1 Softether | 1 Vpn | 2025-11-04 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the CtEnumCa() functionality of SoftEther VPN 4.41-9782-beta and 5.01.9674. Specially crafted network packets can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can send packets to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-49594 | 1 Michaelkelly | 1 Duouniversalkeycloakauthenticator | 2025-11-04 | N/A | 4.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the challenge functionality of instipod DuoUniversalKeycloakAuthenticator 1.0.7 plugin. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. A user logging into Keycloak using DuoUniversalKeycloakAuthenticator plugin triggers this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-57923 | 2025-10-24 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| An Insertion of Sensitive Information into Sent Data vulnerability in the Ideal Postcodes UK Address Postcode Validation WordPress plugin exposes the API key, allowing unauthorized third parties to retrieve and reuse the key across any domain. Since API keys are unrestricted by default, with the “Allowed URLs” field left empty upon creation of API key this can lead to unauthorized use and depletion of API credits.Note: the vulnerability is assessed based on the default configuration.This issue affects UK Address Postcode Validation: from n/a through 3.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59268 | 1 F5 | 21 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 18 more | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| On the BIG-IP system, undisclosed endpoints that contain static non-sensitive information are accessible to an unauthenticated remote attacker through the Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35189 | 1 Ethyca | 1 Fides | 2025-10-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. The Fides webserver has a number of endpoints that retrieve `ConnectionConfiguration` records and their associated `secrets` which _can_ contain sensitive data (e.g. passwords, private keys, etc.). These `secrets` are stored encrypted at rest (in the application database), and the associated endpoints are not meant to expose that sensitive data in plaintext to API clients, as it could be compromising. Fides's developers have available to them a Pydantic field-attribute (`sensitive`) that they can annotate as `True` to indicate that a given secret field should not be exposed via the API. The application has an internal function that uses `sensitive` annotations to mask the sensitive fields with a `"**********"` placeholder value. This vulnerability is due to a bug in that function, which prevented `sensitive` API model fields that were _nested_ below the root-level of a `secrets` object from being masked appropriately. Only the `BigQuery` connection configuration secrets meets these criteria: the secrets schema has a nested sensitive `keyfile_creds.private_key` property that is exposed in plaintext via the APIs. Connection types other than `BigQuery` with sensitive fields at the root-level that are not nested are properly masked with the placeholder and are not affected by this vulnerability. This vulnerability has been patched in Fides version 2.37.0. Users are advised to upgrade to this version or later to secure their systems against this threat. Users are also advised to rotate any Google Cloud secrets used for BigQuery integrations in their Fides deployments. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48381 | 1 Cvat | 1 Computer Vision Annotation Tool | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) is an interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. In versions starting from 2.4.0 to before 2.38.0, an authenticated CVAT user may be able to retrieve the IDs and names of all tasks, projects, labels, and the IDs of all jobs and quality reports on the CVAT instance. In addition, if the instance contains many resources of a particular type, retrieving this information may tie up system resources, denying access to legitimate users. This issue has been patched in version 2.38.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47569 | 1 Fortinet | 12 Fortimail, Fortimanager, Fortimanager Cloud and 9 more | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A insertion of sensitive information into sent data in Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.9, 6.0.7 through 6.0.12, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.9, FortiOS 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.17, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, FortiWeb 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.3, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 1.5.0 through 1.5.3, FortiPAM 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiTester 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.3.0 through 7.3.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0, 4.2.0 through 4.2.1, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.21, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.1 through 7.4.3 allows attacker to disclose sensitive information via specially crafted packets. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5213 | 1 Mintplexlabs | 1 Anythingllm | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In mintplex-labs/anything-llm versions up to and including 1.5.3, an issue was discovered where the password hash of a user is returned in the response after login (`POST /api/request-token`) and after account creations (`POST /api/admin/users/new`). This exposure occurs because the entire User object, including the bcrypt password hash, is included in the response sent to the frontend. This practice could potentially lead to sensitive information exposure despite the use of bcrypt, a strong hashing algorithm. It is recommended not to expose any clues about passwords to the frontend. | |||||
| CVE-2024-3502 | 1 Lunary | 1 Lunary | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In lunary-ai/lunary versions up to and including 1.2.5, an information disclosure vulnerability exists where account recovery hashes of users are inadvertently exposed to unauthorized actors. This issue occurs when authenticated users inspect responses from `GET /v1/users/me` and `GET /v1/users/me/org` endpoints. The exposed account recovery hashes, while not directly related to user passwords, represent sensitive information that should not be accessible to unauthorized parties. Exposing these hashes could potentially facilitate account recovery attacks or other malicious activities. The vulnerability was addressed in version 1.2.6. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43825 | 2025-10-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.4, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.5, 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows sensitive user data to be included in the Freemarker template. This weakness permits an unauthorized actor to gain access to, and potentially render, confidential information that should remain restricted. | |||||